refactor(knowledge): make package runtime-independent#55
Conversation
tangletools
left a comment
tangletools
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Auto-approved drewstone PR — 10629d65
This PR was opened by the trusted drewstone account.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.
tangletools · auto-approval · reason: drewstone_author · 2026-07-08T18:54:35Z
tangletools
left a comment
tangletools
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚪ Value Audit — audit-incomplete
| Verdict | audit-incomplete |
| Concerns | 0 (none) |
| Heuristic | 0.0s |
| Duplication | 0.0s |
| Interrogation | 8.5s (2 bridge agents) |
| Total | 8.5s |
💰 Value — error
value agent produced no parseable value-audit JSON.
- Model: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
- Bridge attempts: 3
- Bridge error: opencode/kimi-for-coding/k2p7: bridge stream ended without value-audit content; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.2: bridge stream ended without value-audit content; opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: bridge stream ended without value-audit content
🎯 Usefulness — error
usefulness agent produced no parseable value-audit JSON.
- Model: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
- Bridge attempts: 3
- Bridge error: opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.2: bridge stream ended without value-audit content; opencode/kimi-for-coding/k2p7: bridge stream ended without value-audit content; opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: bridge stream ended without value-audit content
No PR concerns were produced because the value/usefulness agent pass did not complete. Treat this audit as incomplete, not as approval.
What this audit checks
It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.
| Pass | What it asks |
|---|---|
| Heuristic | Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only) |
| Duplication | Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo? |
| Value Audit | What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists? |
| Usefulness Audit | Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used? |
Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.
2 participants
Summary
agent-knowledge -> agent-runtimepackage dependency by deleting runtime-backed profile/supervisor/autodata exports.improveKnowledgeBase({ updateKnowledge }).candidateRoot/baselineRoot/run metadata intoupdateKnowledgeso runtime supervisors can update isolated candidate KBs safely.Validation
pnpm exec biome check src testspnpm exec tsc --noEmitpnpm exec tsuppnpm exec vitest run— 211 passed, 10 skippedgit merge-tree --write-tree origin/main HEAD